4.2 Article

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Childhood Growth Trajectories

Journal

JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 1308-1314

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40615-021-01071-y

Keywords

Childhood obesity; Longitudinal data; Ethnic disparities; Racial disparities; BMI

Funding

  1. training grant Illinois Transdisciplinary Obesity Prevention Program (ITOPP) - National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [2011-67001-30101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have shown significant racial disparities in childhood overweight and obesity among Black, Latino/a, and White children, particularly in children under nine years old. These differences exist from birth, indicating the need for early intervention and attention.
Childhood overweight and obesity are a primary social and public health concern. Over the past 30 years, rates of childhood overweight and obesity in the United States of America (USA) have drastically increased, particularly among Black and Latino/a populations. However, they tend to be underrepresented in the childhood obesity literature. This study expands previous literature by identifying different BMI growth trajectories for Black, Latino/a, and White children from birth to age nine. This study found a high prevalence rate of overweight and obesity in a predominantly low-income minority group. Using growth-based trajectory modeling, this study also found different growth trajectories by racial/ethnic groups, with Latino/a children having the most concerning growth trajectories from birth to 9 years. These findings demonstrate that ethnic/racial disparities in childhood overweight and obesity start as early as birth, indicating the need to devote more attention from researchers and health policy-makers to address these disparities as early as possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available