A “Trojan horse” in the reference lists: Citations to a hijacked journal in SSCI-indexed marketing journals

Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review

(2020) Samantha Cukier et al.   BMC Medicine

A “Trojan Horse” in the peer-review process of fee-charging economic journals

(2020) Roberto Dell'Anno et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Is Microsoft Academic a viable citation source for ranking marketing journals?

(2019) Salim Moussa   Aslib Journal of Information Management

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

(2019) Agnes Grudniewicz et al.   NATURE

Predatory journals recruit fake editor

(2017) Piotr Sorokowski et al.   NATURE

Predatory journals: Beall's List is missed

(2017) Wadim Strielkowski   NATURE

Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?

(2017) Aamir Raoof Memon   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature

(2017) Gali Halevi et al.   Journal of Informetrics

Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics

(2016) Mehdi Dadkhah et al.   Forensic Science Medicine and Pathology

Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones

(2016) Amin Asadi et al.   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Who's Afraid of Peer Review?

(2013) John Bohannon   SCIENCE