CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 626-637
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2016-10-13
DOI
10.1111/hex.12493
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Citizens’ Perspectives on Disinvestment from Publicly Funded Pathology Tests: A Deliberative Forum
- (2015) Jackie M. Street et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Which public and why deliberate? – A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research
- (2015) Chris Degeling et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial
- (2015) Kristin L. Carman et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Disinvestment policy and the public funding of assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes of deliberative engagements with three key stakeholder groups
- (2014) Katherine Hodgetts et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Cystic fibrosis: to screen or not to screen? Involving a Citizens' jury in decisions on screening carrier
- (2014) Paola Mosconi et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: A systematic review
- (2014) Jackie Street et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screening
- (2014) Rae Thomas et al. BMJ Open
- Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
- (2014) T. C. Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Yes, The Government Should Tax Soft Drinks: Findings from a Citizens’ Jury in Australia
- (2014) Nicole Moretto et al. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Citizens' perspectives on personalized medicine: a qualitative public deliberation study
- (2013) Yvonne Bombard et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- An International Survey of the Public Engagement Practices of Health Technology Assessment Organizations
- (2013) Jennifer A. Whitty VALUE IN HEALTH
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
- (2013) D. Husereau et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials
- (2013) T. C. Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it ‘in one ear and out the other’?
- (2012) Tania Stafinski et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Women "jurors" are asked how to present risk-benefit ratio of breast cancer screening
- (2012) N. Hawkes BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice?
- (2011) Caron Molster et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach
- (2011) Yvonne Bombard et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach
- (2010) Annette J Braunack-Mayer et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- Does the public think it is reasonable to wait for more evidence before funding innovative health technologies? The case of PET scanning in Ontario
- (2010) Roger Chafe et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Research priorities in urinary incontinence: results from citizens’ juries
- (2009) P Herbison et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Pandemic influenza communication: views from a deliberative forum
- (2009) Wendy A. Rogers et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review
- (2009) Craig Mitton et al. HEALTH POLICY
- Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research
- (2009) L. Parkin et al. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- My health: whose responsibility? A jury decides
- (2009) P. Elwood et al. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- Citizens’ juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome
- (2008) Rachael Gooberman-Hill et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens’ jury
- (2008) Devidas Menon et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement
- (2008) Michael Burgess et al. Personalized Medicine
- Engaging the Public on Biobanks: Outcomes of the BC Biobank Deliberation
- (2008) K.C. O’Doherty et al. Public Health Genomics
- Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debate
- (2008) David M. Secko et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens’ deliberation
- (2007) Charlotte Paul et al. HEALTH POLICY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started