Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Authors
Keywords
PRO-CTCAE, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Symptoms, Adverse Events, Mode of Administration, Interactive Voice Response System
Journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-02-19
DOI
10.1186/s12955-016-0426-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013
- (2015) Willie Muehlhausen et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Evaluation of mode equivalence of the MSKCC Bowel Function Instrument, LASA Quality of Life, and Subjective Significance Questionnaire items administered by Web, interactive voice response system (IVRS), and paper
- (2015) Antonia V. Bennett et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
- (2015) Amylou C. Dueck et al. JAMA Oncology
- Recommended Patient-Reported Core Set of Symptoms to Measure in Adult Cancer Treatment Trials
- (2014) B. B. Reeve et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
- (2014) E. Basch et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- PRO Data Collection in Clinical Trials Using Mixed Modes: Report of the ISPOR PRO Mixed Modes Good Research Practices Task Force
- (2014) Sonya Eremenco et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity
- (2013) Jakob B. Bjorner et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Testing the measurement equivalence of paper and interactive voice response system versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30
- (2013) J. Jason Lundy et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- A literature synthesis of symptom prevalence and severity in persons receiving active cancer treatment
- (2013) Carolyn Miller Reilly et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Comparison Between Patient-Reported and Clinician-Observed Symptoms in Oncology
- (2012) Canhua Xiao et al. CANCER NURSING
- Reliability of adverse symptom event reporting by clinicians
- (2011) Thomas M. Atkinson et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Measurement Equivalence of Interactive Voice Response and Paper Versions of the EQ-5D in a Cancer Patient Sample
- (2011) J. Jason Lundy et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Stakeholder perspectives on implementing the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
- (2011) Deborah Watkins Bruner et al. Translational Behavioral Medicine
- Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics
- (2010) Geoff Norman ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION
- Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report
- (2008) Stephen Joel Coons et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Equivalence of Electronic and Paper-and-Pencil Administration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Meta-Analytic Review
- (2007) Chad J. Gwaltney et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now