4.7 Article

Elaborating on the consumer's intention-behavior gap regarding 5G technology: The moderating role of the product market-creation ability

Journal

TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101657

Keywords

5G technology; Intention-behavior gap; Market creation; Structural equation modelling (SEM) technique

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71672004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that intentions have a positive impact on the usage behavior of 5G technology, and that the market creation ability of 5G technology products can moderate and encourage the relationship between intentions and usage behavior.
The Existent theories of information and communication technology (ICT) expose behavioral intention as the key predictor in technology usage behavior. Still, the evidence divulges only a low influence on this relationship. This disparity is named the 'intention-behavior gap', and we believe that it requires more theoretical analysis to better understand this gap. This research aims to find novel factors to overcome these constraints and perceive the mechanism of how intentions lead to actual behavior. In the technology user's context, this study has acknowledged product market creation ability as an encouraging factor to overcome such limitations. Data was collected from Chinese consumers (n = 327) in Beijing and was examined employing the structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. The outcomes confirm that intentions have a positive impact on the usage behavior of 5G technology. The outcomes demonstrate that the market creation ability of the 5G technology products moderate and encourage the intentions and usage behavior relationship. Policy-makers and managers who aim to make positive changes in the behavior of technology users are motivated to consider the inferences of this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available