3.8 Article

Management of walled-off necrosis with nasocystic irrigation with hydrogen peroxide versus biflanged metal stent: randomized controlled trial

Journal

ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages E1108-E1115

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1480-7115

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the clinical efficacy of nasocystic irrigation with H2O2 and BMS in managing WON and found that both treatments were equally effective in terms of technical and clinical success, additional procedure requirements, and adverse events. However, nasocystic irrigation had longer time to clinical success and procedure time compared to BMS.
Background and study aims Walled-off necrosis (WON) is a known complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). There is no study comparing nasocystic irrigation with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) versus biflanged metal stent (BMS) in the management of WON. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of both the treatment strategies. Patients and methods This study was conducted on patients with symptomatic WON who were randomized to nasocystic irrigation with H2O2 (Group A) and BMS placement (Group B). Primary outcomes were clinical and technical success while secondary outcomes were procedure time, adverse events, need for additional procedures, duration of hospitalization, and mortality. Results Fifty patients were randomized into two groups. Group A (n=25, age 37.8 +/- 17.6 years, 16 men) and Group B (n =25, age 41.8 +/- 15.2 years, 17 men). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The most common etiology of pancreatitis was alcohol, observed in 27 (54%) patients. Technical success (100% vs 96%, P= 0.98), clinical success (84% vs 76%, P= 0.76), requirement of additional procedures (16% vs 24%, P= 0.70) and adverse events (4 vs 7, P= 0.06) were comparable in both the groups. The duration to clinical success (34.4 +/- 12 vs 14.8 +/- 10.8 days, P=0.001) and procedure time (36 +/- 15 vs 18 +/- 12 minutes, P= 0.01) were longer in Group A compared to Group B. Conclusions Nasocystic irrigation with H2O2 and BMS are equally effective in the management of WON but time to clinical success and procedure time is longer with nasocystic irrigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available