4.3 Article

Small business training to improve management practices in developing countries: re-assessing the evidence for 'training doesn't work'

Journal

OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 276-301

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grab002

Keywords

business training; microenterprises; management practices; soft skills

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research suggests that small business training can increase profits and sales by an average of 5-10%, but these impacts are often too small to be detected by most experiments. Different approaches to improving the effectiveness of traditional training, such as incorporating gender, kaizen methods, localization and mentoring, heuristics, and psychology, are discussed. The challenge lies in delivering a quality training program on a cost-effective basis at a larger scale, with possible approaches including utilizing the market, technology, or targeting and funnelling firms.
Despite the popularity of business training among policy-makers, its use has faced increasing scepticism. Most of the first randomized experiments could not detect statistically significant impacts of training on firm profits or sales. I reassess the evidence for whether small business training works, incorporating more recent results. A meta-analysis of these estimates shows that training increases profits and sales on average by 5-10 per cent. This is in line with what is optimistic to expect, but impacts of this magnitude are too small for most experiments to detect. I then discuss five approaches for improving the effectiveness of traditional training by incorporating gender, kaizen methods, localization and mentoring, heuristics, and psychology. The challenge is then how to deliver a quality programme on a cost-effective basis at a much larger scale. Three possible approaches to scaling up training are discussed: using the market, using technology, or targeting and funnelling firms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available