4.3 Article

Power and the Tweet: How Viral Messaging Conveys Political Advantage

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 505-520

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0743915621999036

Keywords

assessment orientation; conservatives; regulatory mode; republican party; social media

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers are studying the impact of social media on democratic discourse, particularly through analyzing tweets from the official Twitter accounts of the Democratic and Republican Parties. They found that Republican Party tweets are more likely to dominate in terms of language of assessment, leading to more retweets. As political parties gain control of successive branches of government, obstacles are reduced, leading to a decrease in the regulatory fit for assessment-oriented language.
Researchers are increasingly confronting the need to examine the impacts of social media on democratic discourse. Analyzing 55,560 tweets from the official Twitter accounts of the Democratic and Republican Parties in the United States, the authors examine approaches used by political parties to encourage sharing of their content within the contemporary political divide. They show that tweets sent by the Republican Party are more likely to be predominant in the language of assessment and that tweets predominant in the language of assessment lead to more retweets. Further, this effect is reduced as political parties gain control of successive branches of government because successive increases in political power create fewer impediments to the implementation of a party's political agenda. As impediments to action are reduced, so is regulatory fit for assessment-oriented language. Goal pursuit language shared on Twitter therefore reveals distinct approaches to obtaining and wielding power across the U.S. political system and constitutes an important tool for public policy makers to use in successfully conducting policy debates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available