4.2 Article

Fathers' Prenatal Attachment Representations and the Quality of Father-Child Interaction in Infancy and Toddlerhood

Journal

JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 478-488

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/fam0000813

Keywords

transition to fatherhood; father-child relationship; prenatal attachment representations; the STEPS study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This longitudinal study found that fathers' prenatal attachment representations have a significant impact on the quality of father-child interaction during infancy, but this impact diminishes as the child grows older. Additionally, positive changes were observed in the interaction quality between 4 and 18 months across different categories of attachment representations, suggesting an optimistic view of the evolving nature of the father-child relationship.
Despite the strong evidence that fathers have a crucial role in child well-being, very little is known about the development of the father-child relationship from prenatal to postnatal period. In this longitudinal study, the fathers' prenatal attachment representations (n = 129), between 29 and 32 gestational weeks, were assessed with the Working Model of Child Interview, and the father-child interaction was analyzed with the Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment at 4 and 18 months after the birth. The results showed that fathers' prenatal balanced attachment representations were associated with more positive paternal behaviors compared to fathers with disengaged attachment representations when the child was 4 months old, but not when the child was 18 months old. In addition, positive changes occurred in the interaction quality between 4 and 18 months in all three groups of representation categories (balanced, disengaged, distorted), which offers an optimistic view of the evolving nature of the father-child relationship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available