Big numbers for bold activists: A quick method for estimating potential emissions of fossil fuel projects
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Big numbers for bold activists: A quick method for estimating potential emissions of fossil fuel projects
Authors
Keywords
Mitigation, Keep it in the ground movement, Emissions quantification, Method
Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 102172
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-07-19
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2021.102172
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050
- (2020) Ilona M. Otto et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming
- (2019) Christopher J. Smith et al. Nature Communications
- Why setting a climate deadline is dangerous
- (2019) Shinichiro Asayama et al. Nature Climate Change
- Persistent fossil fuel growth threatens the Paris Agreement and planetary health
- (2019) R B Jackson et al. Environmental Research Letters
- Whose carbon is burnable? Equity considerations in the allocation of a “right to extract”
- (2018) Sivan Kartha et al. CLIMATIC CHANGE
- Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies
- (2018) Fergus Green et al. CLIMATIC CHANGE
- Defining tipping points for social-ecological systems scholarship—an interdisciplinary literature review
- (2018) Manjana Milkoreit et al. Environmental Research Letters
- A dynamic quasi comprehensive model for determining the carbon footprint of fossil fuel electricity: A case study of Iran
- (2018) Fatemeh Dalir et al. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
- Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain
- (2018) Ramón A. Alvarez et al. SCIENCE
- Life cycle carbon emission modelling of coal-fired power: Chinese case
- (2018) Ning Wang et al. ENERGY
- Limiting fossil fuel production as the next big step in climate policy
- (2018) Peter Erickson et al. Nature Climate Change
- Can science on transformation transform science? Lessons from co-design
- (2016) Susanne C Moser Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
- The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C
- (2015) Christophe McGlade et al. NATURE
- Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate-Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers
- (2013) Richard J. Plevin et al. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
- Coupling Human Information and Knowledge Systems with social–ecological systems change: Reframing research, education, and policy for sustainability
- (2012) J. David Tàbara et al. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
- Life Cycle Carbon Footprint of Shale Gas: Review of Evidence and Implications
- (2012) Christopher L. Weber et al. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
- Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Coal-Fired Electricity Generation
- (2012) Michael Whitaker et al. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
- Narrowing the climate information usability gap
- (2012) Maria Carmen Lemos et al. Nature Climate Change
- The supply chain of CO2 emissions
- (2011) S. J. Davis et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The budget approach: A framework for a global transformation toward a low-carbon economy
- (2010) Dirk Messner et al. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
- Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions
- (2010) S. J. Davis et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change
- (2009) K. Zickfeld et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The Importance of Carbon Footprint Estimation Boundaries
- (2008) H. Scott Matthews et al. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started