4.6 Article

Digital inequality in Finland: Access, skills and attitudes as social impact mediators

Journal

NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 2475-2491

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14614448211023007

Keywords

access; attitudes; benefits; digital inequality; online services; personal resources; skills; social resources; socioeconomic position

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid expansion of digital health care and social welfare services may result in digital inequality. This population-based study in Finland found that individuals with lower personal, economic, and social resources perceived online services to be less beneficial, primarily due to poor access, digital skills, and negative attitudes towards these services. To promote equality, it is important to improve internet access and digital skills, and address negative attitudes, especially among vulnerable groups. In addition, online health and social welfare services should be designed to be more inclusive.
In recent years, digital health care and social welfare services have been spreading rapidly and partly replacing face-to-face services, particularly in developed countries. This may lead to a pronounced digital inequality. This population-based study of Finnish adults (N = 4495) examined the associations of offline resources with perceived benefits from online services and the mediating effects of access, skills and attitudes in these associations. The results indicated that those with lower personal, economic and social offline resources perceived online services as less beneficial. This was largely explained by poor access to the services, poor digital skills and negative attitudes towards online services. To increase equality, it would be important to improve Internet access and digital skills and implement means to address negative attitudes, especially among vulnerable groups. Moreover, online health and social welfare services should be designed to be more inclusive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available