4.3 Article

Measures of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Uptake Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in Canada and Demographic Disparities Among Those at Elevated Likelihood for HIV Acquisition

Journal

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 3638-3650

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03336-3

Keywords

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); Uptake; GBMSM; Correlates; Disparities; Canada

Funding

  1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea) [2015 71 01]
  2. Public Health Agency of Canada
  3. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research [16863]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PrEP uptake among gbMSM at elevated HIV risk in Canada is relatively high in terms of awareness, knowledge, acceptability, and pursuit, but lower in actual usage. Factors influencing PrEP uptake include residency in larger cities, openness about sexual orientation to family and friends, financial stability, and age between 30-49. Addressing these disparities could lead to improved upscaling of PrEP in Canada.
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective prevention tool being scaled up in Canada. We describe PrEP uptake and identify demographic correlates of uptake among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) at elevated HIV risk using data from an online survey of gbMSM residing in Canada between Oct 2017 and Jan 2018. Among the 969 participants at elevated HIV risk who had recently tested for HIV, 96.0%, 83.3%, 72.6%, and 39.7% reported awareness, knowledge, acceptability, and pursuit of PrEP, respectively; 27.1% had ever and 24.6% were currently taking PrEP. The strongest correlate of PrEP uptake was living in a city of >= 500,000 inhabitants; others included being out to all or almost all family, friends, and colleagues regarding sexual attraction to men, greater financial coping, and being 30-49 years of age. Improved upscaling of PrEP in Canada may be accomplished through consideration of these disparities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available