Understanding institutional change mechanisms for land use: Lessons from Ecuador's history

Ecuador constitutes a fascinating case study to explore land policies and reforms. Since colonial times, it has experienced prolonged and ongoing struggles to transform land institutions. This paper investigates how, across levels, historic institutional factors affected land-use decision making in the Mindo parish and western foothills of Pichincha, Ecuador, as perceived by its landowners. Following techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, we identify four main periods of institutional change related to land by relying on the narratives of landowners. These periods are: a) colonial institutions - hacienda feudal modes of production; b) the way toward an Agrarian Reform and Colonization Law; c) rural development after the Agrarian Reform; and d) forest conservation incentives versus 'neo-extractivism' practices. We reconstruct and explore these in light of the existing literature. Along with individual and collective perceptions, we are also concerned with the drivers underlying these institutional changes and the structure of these changes. Lastly, we discuss and provide conclusions on the key issues that help us explain institutional change in the study area, including theoretical explanations about cognitive variation (cultural-cognitive), power relationships, individual ability to change and perceive, as well as the system's capacity to reorganize, persist, and reproduce.

Automated summary

Ecuador's land policies and reforms have gone through various stages, from colonial hacienda feudal modes of production to modern forest conservation and "neo-extractivism" practices. The study examines how historical institutional factors have influenced land-use decision making through narratives of landowners, and discusses the drivers and structure of institutional change.