Fatalism in the Early Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Mitigation and Mental Health

This research assessed fatalism toward COVID-19 and its role in behavioral intentions to support mitigation efforts (e. g., social distancing) and mental well-being. A COVID-19 fatalism measure was developed, and a messaging manipulation (fatalistic vs. optimistic vs. no message) was created to examine causal links between fatalism scores. Support for mitigation efforts and negative affect (anxiety, fear, depression, and insecurity) were measured to examine the consequences of fatalism toward COVID-19. Results showed that the fatalistic messaging condition increased fatalism whereas the optimistic message reduced it. The effects of the messaging manipulation were also apparent in the downstream measures of support for mitigation and negative affect through the mediator of fatalism toward COVID-19. Specifically, fatalism negatively predicted intentions to support mitigation. Regarding mental health, fatalism was positively associated with depression but negatively associated with fear and insecurity. Implications for COVID-19 mitigation efforts and mental health in the face of the coronavirus pandemic are discussed.

Automated summary

This research examined fatalism towards COVID-19 and its impact on support for mitigation efforts and mental well-being. The results showed that fatalistic messaging increased fatalism, while optimistic messaging reduced it. Fatalism was found to negatively predict intentions to support mitigation efforts, positively associated with depression, and negatively associated with fear and insecurity.