4.2 Article

Inhaled anesthesia in neurosurgery: Still a role?

Journal

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 231-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.10.004

Keywords

inhalational halogenated agents; craniotomy; neurophysiological monitoring; recovery from anesthesia; time of awakening; PONV

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In patients undergoing craniotomy, the latest generation of halogenated agents may have advantages over intravenous drugs, including rapid induction, faster recovery, and cardioprotective effects.
In patients undergoing craniotomy, general anesthesia should be addressed to warrant good hypnosis, immobility, and analgesia, to ensure systemic and cerebral physiological status and provide the best possible surgical field. Regarding craniotomies, it is unclear if there are substantial differences in providing general anesthesia using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or balanced anesthesia (BA) accomplished using the third generation halogenates. New evidence highlighted that the last generation of halogenated agents has possible advantages compared with intravenous drugs: rapid induction, minimal absorption and metabolization, reproducible pharmacokinetic, faster recovery, cardioprotective effect, and opioid spare analgesia. This review aims to report evidence related to the use of the latest halogenated agents in patients undergoing craniotomy and to present available clinical evidence on their effects: cerebral and systemic hemodynamic, neurophysiological monitoring, and timing and quality of recovery after anesthesia. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available