4.7 Article

Performance analysis of different U-shaped heat exchangers in parabolic trough solar collector for air heating applications

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 25, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.100949

Keywords

Solar air heater; Parabolic trough collector; Evacuated absorber tube; Heat exchanger; Fins; Thermal efficiency

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article evaluates the thermal performance of a parabolic trough solar air heater with a U-shaped heat exchanger, comparing copper and aluminum heat exchangers. It was found that the system with a copper heat exchanger outperformed the one with an aluminum heat exchanger, especially when using fins and at high flow rates. Additionally, the efficiency and temperature difference of the solar air heater were significantly improved with the use of fins and copper heat exchanger.
In this article, the thermal performance of a parabolic trough solar air heater (PTSAH) with a Ushaped heat exchanger is evaluated. The solar air heater?s performance is examined by using the copper and aluminum U-shaped heat exchangers (UHX) with and without fin alternately, inside the absorber tube placed at the focal length of the nickel-coated stainless steel parabolic trough. The system is examined in the form of temperature difference achieved at the outlet for both the heat exchangers and the solar air heater?s efficiency. It is observed that the system performance with the copper heat exchanger is better than the aluminum heat exchanger. Further, it has been found that the efficiency of the solar air heater is increased by 9.29% at a high flow rate with the use of fin when using a copper heat exchanger in place of the aluminum heat exchanger. The temperature difference achieved by the system is also increased by 2.34% at a low flow rate. At elevated temperatures, the percentage increase in solar air heater performance for the aluminum heat exchanger is higher than the copper heat exchanger.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available