4.7 Article

Pore structure evolution during lignite pyrolysis based on nuclear magnetic resonance

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101125

Keywords

Lignite; Pore structure; Pyrolysis; Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pore structure of lignite plays a crucial role in its high-temperature treatment processes. Research has shown that the connectivity, porosity, and permeability of lignite increase at 250°C, decrease at 350°C, and then increase again at 450°C. At 450°C, the porosity, effective porosity, and permeability of lignite were 18.32%, 30.22%, and 856.98 md, respectively.
Increasing attention is being paid to the clean and efficient mining and utilization of coal resources. Lignite is a major component of coal; however, its high moisture and volatile contents and low calorific value cause it to have low mining and utilization efficiencies. During the dehydration, upgrading and in-situ heat injection or underground coal gasification of lignite, its pore structure plays an important role in the pyrolysis and product transfer processes. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically study the high-temperature pore structure of lignite. The evolution of pore fissures in gas-pyrolyzed lignite was studied by nuclear magnetic resonance combined with a gas heating reactor and test device. We found that the total connectivity, porosity and permeability of lignite increased between temperatures of 25 degrees C and 250 degrees C, then decreased at 350 degrees C and increased again at 450 degrees C. At 450 degrees C, the porosity, effective porosity and permeability of lignite were 18.32%, 30.22% and 856.98 md, respectively. The evolution in the pore structure parameters of lignite with temperature was observed to determine the changes in seepage channels that occur during the processes of lignite mining and utilization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available