Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
Continence recovery, Potency recovery, Positive margins, Prostate cancer, Radical prostatectomy, Retzius sparing
Journal
European Urology Focus
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-08-21
DOI
10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery: Outcomes from the First Multicentre, Randomised, Patient-blinded Controlled Trial in Radical Prostatectomy (LAP-01)
- (2021) Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy improves early recovery of urinary continence: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial with a 1-year follow-up
- (2020) Xuefeng Qiu et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide
- (2020) Jillian Egan et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Retzius-Sparing Versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Prospective Study of Nearly 500 Patients
- (2020) Paolo Umari et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2019) Chandan Phukan et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches
- (2019) Francesco Alessandro Mistretta et al. International Braz J Urol
- Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes
- (2019) Enrico Checcucci et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches
- (2018) Mani Menon et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates
- (2018) Anastasios D. Asimakopoulos et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
- (2017) Deepansh Dalela et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Safe Surgical Technique with Superior Continence Outcomes
- (2017) Rashid K. Sayyid et al. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
- Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches
- (2014) Sey Kiat Lim et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons
- (2013) Jonathan L. Silberstein et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Critical review of ‘pentafecta’ outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high-volume centres
- (2011) Vipul R. Patel et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Positive Surgical Margins After Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study
- (2011) Vipul R. Patel et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- A New Anatomic Approach for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Feasibility Study for Completely Intrafascial Surgery
- (2010) Antonio Galfano et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias
- (2010) Karsten Knobloch et al. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
- A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy Related to Optimization of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy
- (2009) Jochen Walz et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Location, Extent and Number of Positive Surgical Margins Do Not Improve Accuracy of Predicting Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
- (2009) Andrew J. Stephenson et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started