4.5 Article

Neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalised children and adolescents in the UK: a prospective national cohort study

Journal

LANCET CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages 631-641

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00193-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/V03605X/1]
  3. MRC
  4. UKRI [MR/V007181/1]
  5. MRC [MR/T028750/1]
  6. Wellcome Trust [ISSF201902/3, 203919/Z/16/Z]
  7. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  8. NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections [IS-HPU-1112-10117, NIHR200907]
  9. NIHR Global Health Research Group on Brain Infections [17/63/110]
  10. UK MRC Global Effort on COVID-19 Programme [MR/V033441/1]
  11. EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (ZikaPLAN) [734584]
  12. MRC Newton Fund [MR/S019960/1]
  13. MRC Developmental Pathway Funding Scheme [MR/R015406/1]
  14. NIHR [153195 17/60/67, 126156 17/63/11, 200907]
  15. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [734584] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme
  16. MRC [MR/R015406/1, MR/V007181/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This UK study on children with SARS-CoV-2 infection and neurological or psychiatric complications identified key differences between those with primary neurological disorders and those with PIMS-TS, highlighting the need for further investigation into underlying mechanisms and longer-term outcomes.
Background The spectrum of neurological and psychiatric complications associated with paediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection is poorly understood. We aimed to analyse the range and prevalence of these complications in hospitalised children and adolescents. Methods We did a prospective national cohort study in the UK using an online network of secure rapid-response notification portals established by the CoroNerve study group. Paediatric neurologists were invited to notify any children and adolescents (age <18 years) admitted to hospital with neurological or psychiatric disorders in whom they considered SARS-CoV-2 infection to be relevant to the presentation. Patients were excluded if they did not have a neurological consultation or neurological investigations or both, or did not meet the definition for confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (a positive PCR of respiratory or spinal fluid samples, serology for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, or both), or the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health criteria for paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS). Individuals were classified as having either a primary neurological disorder associated with COVID-19 (COVID-19 neurology group) or PIMS-TS with neurological features (PIMS-TS neurology group). The denominator of all hospitalised children and adolescents with COVID-19 was collated from National Health Service England data. Findings Between April 2, 2020, and Feb 1, 2021, 52 cases were identified; in England, there were 51 cases among 1334 children and adolescents hospitalised with COVID-19, giving an estimated prevalence of 3.8 (95% CI 2.9-5.0) cases per 100 paediatric patients. 22 (42%) patients were female and 30 (58%) were male; the median age was 9 years (range 1-17). 36 (69%) patients were Black or Asian, 16 (31%) were White. 27 (52%) of 52 patients were classified into the COVID-19 neurology group and 25 (48%) were classified into the PIMS-TS neurology group. In the COVID-19 neurology group, diagnoses included status epilepticus (n=7), encephalitis (n=5), Guillain-Barre syndrome (n=5), acute demyelinating syndrome (n=3), chorea (n=2), psychosis (n=2), isolated encephalopathy (n=2), and transient ischaemic attack (n=1). The PIMS-TS neurology group more often had multiple features, which included encephalopathy (n=22 [88%]), peripheral nervous system involvement (n=10 [40%]), behavioural change (n=9 [36%]), and hallucinations at presentation (n=6 [24%]). Recognised neuroimmune disorders were more common in the COVID-19 neurology group than in the PIMS-TS neurology group (13 [48%] of 27 patients vs 1 [<1%] of 25 patients, p=0.0003). Compared with the COVID-19 neurology group, more patients in the PIMS-TS neurology group were admitted to intensive care (20 [80%] of 25 patients vs six [22%] of 27 patients, p=0.0001) and received immunomodulatory treatment (22 [88%] patients vs 12 [44%] patients, p=0.045). 17 (33%) patients (10 [37%] in the COVID-19 neurology group and 7 [28%] in the PIMS-TS neurology group) were discharged with disability; one (2%) died (who had stroke, in the PIMS-TS neurology group). Interpretation This study identified key differences between those with a primary neurological disorder versus those with PIMS-TS. Compared with patients with a primary neurological disorder, more patients with PIMS-TS needed intensive care, but outcomes were similar overall. Further studies should investigate underlying mechanisms for neurological involvement in COVID-19 and the longer-term outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available