4.5 Review

Health and environmental effects of silent killers Organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyl

Journal

JOURNAL OF KING SAUD UNIVERSITY SCIENCE
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101511

Keywords

Aquatic; Bioaccumulation; Bioindicators; Ecosystem; Food chain; Remediations

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFD0901002]
  2. Shenzhen science and technology application demonstration project [KJYY20180201180253571]
  3. Research Center for Advanced Materials Science (RCAMS) at King Khalid University Abha, Saudi Arabia [RCAMS/KKU/002-21]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are silent killers known for their bioaccumulative and longlasting existence, posing danger to aquatic habitats and human health through biomagnification in the food web. Understanding their distribution in the aquatic environment is crucial for a detailed understanding of the activities and threats of POPs.
Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are known to be silent killers due to their bioaccumulative and longlasting existence. These pollutants are present everywhere in our environment, including plants, animals, and humans. POPs can be stored in several aquatic environmental matrices and biomagnified by the food web, thus presenting a danger to aquatic habitats and human health. During recent decades, they have gained substantial attention considering their possible persistent threats. In the aquatic environment, legacy POPs, such as organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), were widely found and recorded. A complete description of OCPs and PCBs amounts and their distribution in the aquatic environment is necessary for a detailed understanding of the activities and threats of POPs in aquatic ecosystems. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available