4.7 Article

Determination of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Teas Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Combined with Rapid-Easy Extraction

Journal

FOODS
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10102250

Keywords

pyrrolizidine alkaloids; tea; natural toxins; LC-MS/MS; SPE

Funding

  1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) of the Republic of Korea [17161MFDS013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed an analytical method to determine pyrrolizidine alkaloids in teas using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry combined with rapid-easy extraction. The method showed excellent repeatability, sensitivity, and reproducibility, and could be applied to various tea samples. Overall, the method allows complete separation of lycopsamine and intermedine peaks, making it useful for monitoring pyrrolizidine alkaloids in teas.
This study developed an analytical method to determine pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) in teas using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry combined with rapid-easy extraction. PAs were extracted with 40 mL of 0.05 M sulfuric acid in 50% methanol solution and cleaned up using Oasis MCX SPE cartridges. Chromatographic separation of 21 PAs was conducted on an X-Bridge C18 column with gradient elution. According to the AOAC official analysis methods, the developed method was verified to establish linearity, limits of detection, limits of quantification, accuracy, inter-day precision, and intra-day precision for each PA. Overall, the method showed excellent repeatability, sensitivity, and reproducibility. The verified method was applied to tea samples, including mate, lemon balm, fennel, hibiscus, chrysanthemum, lavender, oolong tea, chamomile, rooibos, peppermint, mix tea, black, and green tea. One of the main advantages of the method developed in this study is that it allows complete separation of lycopsamine and intermedine peaks. Therefore, the method could be used to monitor PAs in teas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available