4.7 Review

Decommissioning Research Needs for Offshore Oil and Gas Infrastructure in Australia

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.711151

Keywords

oil and gas decommissioning; Australia; decision-making; productivity; connectivity; contaminants; social license

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Offshore oil and gas infrastructure, when no longer needed, undergo the processes of removal, partial removal, or repurposing, collectively known as decommissioning. In Australia, companies are required to develop plans for safe removal of offshore infrastructure at the end of a project's life, with decommissioning liability expected to exceed US$45 billion over the next 50 years. Unlike other countries where decommissioning activities are more advanced, Australia's decommissioning activities are still in their early stages, with only three cases of infrastructure being left in place or partially removed. Various factors unique to the Australian marine environment may impact the applicability of decision support tools from other regions for identifying preferred decommissioning options.
When offshore oil and gas infrastructure is no longer needed, it is either removed, partially removed, left in place, or left in place but repurposed. These processes are collectively referred to as decommissioning. Australian legislation requires oil and gas companies to develop acceptable plans for the safe removal of all offshore infrastructure at the end of a project's life. Over the next 50 years, the liability for this decommissioning in Australia is expected to exceed US$45 billion. Unlike countries such as Norway, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Australian decommissioning activities are in their infancy, with only three cases (to date) in Commonwealth waters where infrastructure has been left in place or partially removed as part of decommissioning. Differences between the Australian marine environment and that of other regions around the world where decommissioning-related research is better progressed include very low sedimentation rates, both tropical and temperate habitats, different species composition, low primary production, and frequent tropical cyclones, as well as unique sociodemographic and cultural characteristics. Accordingly, the outcomes of the decision support tools used in other regions to identify preferred decommissioning options may not be equally applicable in Australia. Here we describe research to support risk and impact assessment for offshore decommissioning in Australia, where full removal of infrastructure is the base case regulatory default, but other options including partial removal and/or repurposing might provide similar or better outcomes when environmental, social, economic and seafood safety aspects are considered. Based on our review we propose an integrated framework for research needs to meet legislative requirements for decommissioning and identify research gaps that need to be addressed to inform decision-making for decommissioning in the Australian context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available