4.8 Article

Ecological change predicts population dynamics and genetic diversity over 120 000 years

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 1737-1745

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13196

Keywords

climate change; ecological change; evolution; genetic diversity; population dynamics; population trends; Psammodromus; speciation

Funding

  1. EU Marie Curie-Clarin CoFund grant [ACA14-26]
  2. CSIC JAE-Doc Program
  3. European Social Fund
  4. MINECO Ramon y Cajal Program [RYC-2013-14441]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [CGL2008-01522, CGL2012-32459]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [PPOOP3_128375, PP00P3_152929/1]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P3_152929] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While ecological effects on short-term population dynamics are well understood, their effects over millennia are difficult to demonstrate and convincing evidence is scant. Using coalescent methods, we analysed past population dynamics of three lizard species (Psammodromus hispanicus, P.edwardsianus, P.occidentalis) and linked the results with climate change data covering the same temporal horizon (120000years). An increase in population size over time was observed in two species, and in P.occidentalis, no change was observed. Temporal changes in temperature seasonality and the maximum temperature of the warmest month were congruent with changes in population dynamics observed for the three species and both variables affected population density, either directly or indirectly (via a life-history trait). These results constitute the first solid link between ecological change and long-term population dynamics. The results moreover suggest that ecological change leaves genetic signatures that can be retrospectively traced, providing evidence that ecological change is a crucial driver of genetic diversity and speciation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available