4.4 Review

Current controversies and advances in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Journal

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i6.472

Keywords

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Advances in management; Imaging; Novel approaches; Chemotherapy; Controversies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a lethal disease with poor prognosis, mainly due to challenges in early diagnosis and lack of robust data to support upfront systemic therapy for all patients. Despite advancements in treatment regimens, long-term survival remains poor.
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a lethal disease with a mortality rate that has not significantly improved over decades. This is likely due to several challenges unique to pancreatic cancer. Most patients with pancreatic cancer are diagnosed at a late stage of disease due to the lack of specific symptoms prompting an early investigation. A small subset of patients who are diagnosed at an early stage have a better chance at survival with curative surgical resection, but most patients still succumb to the disease in a few years. The dismal overall prognosis is due to suspected micro-metastasis at an early stage. Due to this reason, there is a recent interest in treating all patients with pancreatic cancers with systemic therapy upfront (including the ones that are surgically resectable). This approach is still not the standard of care due to the lack of robust prospective data available. Recent advancements in treatment regimens of chemotherapy, radiation and immunotherapy have improved the overall short-term survival but the long-term survival still remains poor. Novel approaches in diagnosis and treatment have shown promise in clinical studies but long-term clinical data is lacking. The following manuscript presents an overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, recent advances, novel approaches and controversies in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available