4.6 Review

Negative Regulation of FGFR (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor) Signaling

Journal

CELLS
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10061342

Keywords

FGFR; signaling; endocytosis; negative regulation; phosphatases

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian Cancer Society [198093, 207006]
  2. Research Council of Norway through its Centers of Excellence funding scheme [262652]
  3. Norway Grants 2014-2021 via the National Centre for Research and Development [NOR/POLNOR/DUALDRUG/0058/2019-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

FGFR signaling controls fundamental processes in embryonic, fetal, and adult human life, which must be strictly controlled to induce the correct biological response. Cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to regulate and turn off FGFR signaling, such as endocytosis, phosphatase activity, negative regulatory proteins, and negative feedback phosphorylation events.
FGFR (fibroblast growth factor receptor) signaling controls fundamental processes in embryonic, fetal and adult human life. The magnitude, duration, and location of FGFR signaling must be strictly controlled in order to induce the correct biological response. Uncontrolled receptor signaling has been shown to lead to a variety of diseases, such as skeletal disorders and cancer. Here we review the numerous cellular mechanisms that regulate and turn off FGFR signaling, once the receptor is activated. These mechanisms include endocytosis and endocytic sorting, phosphatase activity, negative regulatory proteins and negative feedback phosphorylation events. The mechanisms act together simultaneously or sequentially, controlling the same or different steps in FGFR signaling. Although more work is needed to fully understand the regulation of FGFR signaling, it is clear that the cells in our body have evolved an extensive repertoire of mechanisms that together keep FGFR signaling tightly controlled and prevent excess FGFR signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available