4.6 Article

Quantitative estimation of intrinsic induced polarization and superparamagnetic parameters from airborne electromagnetic data

Journal

GEOPHYSICS
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages E433-E446

Publisher

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/GEO2016-0110.1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The primary aim of my research is to improve the characterization of induced polarization (IP) responses in airborne electromagnetic (AEM) survey data. The principal objectives are to test alternative methodologies for quantitative modeling and inversion to extract the spatial variation of IP parameters using the inductively thin-sheet model. The methods tested first fit, by nonnegative least squares, an AEM decay to the early delay time data, using thin-sheet basis functions. This modeled AEM decay is assumed to represent the IP source. It is then convolved with a few Cole-Cole models spanning the range of parameter sensitivity to get IP basis functions appropriate for the AEM excitation. Method 1 fits a linear sum of several AEM basis functions plus one IP basis function at a time and chooses the model with least-fitting error at late delay times. Method 2 fits a linear sum of several IP and several AEM basis functions. Both methods fit IP affected airborne data well, with normalized fitting errors being reduced by a significant factor when IP affects the data and is taken into account. Using penalty weights, superparamagnetic (SPM) effects can be simultaneously estimated in the fitting process. Without such weighting, SPM and IP parameter estimations are unstable. Cole-Cole models predict that the sensitivity of inductive airborne IP collected at 25 or 30 Hz base frequency indicates little overlap with galvanic ground IP collected with a 0.125 Hz waveform. Many easy IP sulfide targets with IP physical properties determined by ground surveys are predicted not to have a detectable airborne IP response. Clays, however, are predicted to have a small detectable background response that for airborne data would not be well-fitted by a single Cole-Cole response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Geochemistry & Geophysics

3D-spectral CDIs: a fast alternative to 3D inversion?

James Macnae

EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS (2015)

Article Geochemistry & Geophysics

Airborne electromagnetic modelling options and their consequences in target definition

Alan Yusen Ley-Cooper, Andrea Viezzoli, Julien Guillemoteau, Giulio Vignoli, James Macnae, Leif Cox, Tim Munday

EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS (2015)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Quantifying Airborne Induced Polarization effects in helicopter time domain electromagnetics

James Macnae

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS (2016)

Article Geochemistry & Geophysics

Source-dependent bias of sferics in magnetotelluric responses

Lachlan Hennessy, James Macnae

GEOPHYSICS (2018)

Article Geochemistry & Geophysics

3D time-domain airborne electromagnetic inversion based on secondary field finite-volume method

Xiuyan Ren, Changchun Yin, James Macnae, Yunhe Liu, Bo Zhang

GEOPHYSICS (2018)

Article Geochemistry & Geophysics

Prediction and removal of rotation noise in airborne EM systems

Terence Kratzer, James Macnae

EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS (2014)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

First evidence of detecting surface nuclear magnetic resonance signals using a compact B-field sensor

Aaron C. Davis, Raphael Dlugosch, Matthias Queitsch, James C. Macnae, Ronny Stolz, Andmike Mueller-Petke

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2014)

No Data Available