4.8 Article

Regional scalable priorities for national biodiversity and carbon conservation planning in Asia

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 35, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe4261

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19050404, XDA20050202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1602265]
  3. High-End Foreign Experts Program of Yunnan Province [Y9YN021B01]
  4. World Wildlife Fund [10000759]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a framework to protect 30% of land in Asia, which could effectively protect over 70% of species and substantial carbon reserves. Funding mechanisms are needed at the national level to support biodiversity-carbon conservation while reflecting broader priorities.
To achieve the goals of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework, we must identify representative targets that effectively protect biodiversity and can be implemented at a national level. We developed a framework to identify synergies between biodiversity and carbon across the Asian region and proposed a stepwise approach based on scalable priorities at regional, biome, and national levels that can complement potential Convention on Biological Diversity targets of protecting 30% land in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Our targets show that 30% of Asian land could effectively protect over 70% of all assessed species relative to only 11% now (based on analysis of 8932 terrestrial vertebrates), in addition to 2.3 to 3.6 hundred billion metric tons of carbon. Funding mechanisms are needed to ensure such targets to support biodiversity-carbon mutually beneficial solutions at the national level while reflecting broader priorities, especially in hyperdiverse countries where priorities exceed 30% of land.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available