Comparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants Aged 12 Months or Less
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants Aged 12 Months or Less
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Online
2021-06-14
DOI
10.3389/fped.2021.647139
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Managing Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in the Young Infant
- (2020) Niccolo Maria Passoni et al. Frontiers in Pediatrics
- Robotic surgery in infants and children: an argument for smaller and fewer incisions
- (2019) Trudy Kawal et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Robotic Urologic Surgery in the Infant: a Review
- (2019) Jeffrey Villanueva et al. Current Urology Reports
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
- (2019) Ciro Andolfi et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- ROBOT-ASSISTED vs LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY IN CHILDREN WITH URETERO-PELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION (UPJO): TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND RESULTS
- (2019) Ciro Esposito et al. Journal of Pediatric Urology
- From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children
- (2018) Yuk Him Tam et al. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
- Comparison of Robotic Pyeloplasty and Standard Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants: A Bi-Institutional Study
- (2018) Amos Neheman et al. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
- Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Does age matter?
- (2018) T. Kawal et al. Journal of Pediatric Urology
- Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children
- (2018) Minki Baek et al. Journal of Pediatric Urology
- Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015
- (2018) Briony K. Varda et al. Journal of Pediatric Urology
- Laparoscopic vs Open Pyeloplasty in Children: Results of a Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial
- (2017) John M. Gatti et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants
- (2017) William R. Boysen et al. PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants
- (2015) Daniel I. Avery et al. Journal of Pediatric Urology
- Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children
- (2014) Thomas P. Cundy et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Outcomes of Infants Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Compared to Open Repair
- (2013) Pankaj P. Dangle et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Infant robotic pyeloplasty: Comparison with an open cohort
- (2013) D. Bansal et al. Journal of Pediatric Urology
- Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants
- (2012) Robert M. Turner et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Editorial Comment
- (2012) Walid A. Farhat JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Cost Analysis of Pediatric Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
- (2012) Daniel P. Casella et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2011) Hong Mei et al. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started