4.5 Review

A brief review of electrocatalytic reduction of CO2-Materials, reaction conditions, and devices

Journal

ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 1012-1032

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.935

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0506004, 2018YFC0309800]
  2. Oceanic Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [SL2020MS022]
  3. Center of Hydrogen Science at Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [19ZR1424800]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978170]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical CO2 reduction (ECR) is a promising strategy to address global warming by fixing CO2 in a clean and sustainable manner, but its performance is highly dependent on catalysis systems, reaction conditions, and device configurations. Further research is needed to address these factors for improved ECR efficiency.
Global warming caused by the rapid increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is regarded as one of the most serious problems faced by human being. Electrochemical CO2 reduction (ECR) is one promising strategy that can fix CO2 in a mild and clean manner combined with sustainable energies. However, the ECR performance is highly dependent on the catalysis system because of the difficulty in CO2 activation, low mass transfer, poor product selectivity, and competitive hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The binding strength of electrocatalysts toward carbon intermediates is the crucial factor for ECR performance. Furthermore, the reaction conditions and the configurations of devices are also of significance for ECR efficiencies. Here, we briefly reviewed the effects of electrocatalyst materials, as well as the reaction conditions, coupled anodic reactions, and devices on the ECR. Moreover, challenges and some perspectives for large-scale applications are included.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available