The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 210389
Publisher
The Royal Society
Online
2021-09-07
DOI
10.1098/rsos.210389
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Following the science? Comparison of methodological and reporting quality of covid-19 and other research from the first wave of the pandemic
- (2021) Terence J. Quinn et al. BMC Medicine
- General medical publications during COVID-19 show increased dissemination despite lower validation
- (2021) Nan Gai et al. PLoS One
- Calling for improved quality in the registration of traditional Chinese medicine during the public health emergency: a survey of trial registries for COVID-19, H1N1, and SARS
- (2021) Zhuoran Kuang et al. Trials
- Quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines for treating children with COVID-19
- (2021) Qinyuan Li et al. Annals of Translational Medicine
- Reporting and methodological quality of COVID-19 systematic reviews needs to be improved: an evidence mapping
- (2021) Yanfei Li et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID ‐19 research papers
- (2021) Amandeep Khatter et al. LEARNED PUBLISHING
- Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin
- (2021) Dongguang Wang et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- How to fight an infodemic
- (2020) John Zarocostas LANCET
- Preprints bring ‘firehose’ of outbreak data
- (2020) Kai Kupferschmidt SCIENCE
- Coronavirus disease 2019: The harms of exaggerated information and non‐evidence‐based measures
- (2020) John P. A. Ioannidis EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- COVID-19 coronavirus research has overall low methodological quality thus far: case in point for chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine
- (2020) Paul Elias Alexander et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Against pandemic research exceptionalism
- (2020) Alex John London et al. SCIENCE
- Rapid publications risk the integrity of science in the era of COVID-19
- (2020) N. Bagdasarian et al. BMC Medicine
- High-profile coronavirus retractions raise concerns about data oversight
- (2020) Heidi Ledford et al. NATURE
- Covidization of research: what are the risks?
- (2020) Madhukar Pai NATURE MEDICINE
- The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality
- (2020) Katrina A Bramstedt JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic
- (2020) Silvia Gianola et al. PLoS One
- The COVID-19 social media infodemic
- (2020) Matteo Cinelli et al. Scientific Reports
- Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators
- (2020) John P. A. Ioannidis et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Scientists fear that ‘covidization’ is distorting research
- (2020) David Adam NATURE
- Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days
- (2018) John P. A. Ioannidis et al. NATURE
- Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence
- (2017) Richard Klavans et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines
- (2016) John P.A. Ioannidis et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Epidemiology: A mortal foe
- (2013) Tom Paulson NATURE
- Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring research leadership
- (2010) Richard Klavans et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Toward a consensus map of science
- (2008) Richard Klavans et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started