4.5 Review

The Ecology of River Ice

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021JG006275

Keywords

river; stream; ice; winter; metabolism; food webs; climate change; watershed

Funding

  1. Future Investigators in NASA Earth and Space Science and Technology [80NSSC20K1649]
  2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Upper Mississippi River Restoration Program
  3. National Science Foundation Navigating New Arctic Award [2022554]
  4. NSF EAR postdoctoral fellowship award [EAR-1725266]
  5. Atlantic Salmon Conservation Foundation
  6. New Brunswick Innovation Fund
  7. Directorate For Geosciences
  8. Div of Res, Innovation, Synergies, & Edu [2022554] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the shift in river ice coverage extent as winters warm, pointing out the lag in winter river research compared to the growing season. It is found that physical, chemical, and biological processes vary from small to large rivers, suggesting that ice processes and their impact on river ecology could differ based on river size.
Many of the world's rivers are ice-covered during winter months but increasing evidence indicates that the extent of river ice will shift substantially as winters warm. However, our knowledge of rivers during winter lags far behind that of the growing season, limiting our understanding of how ice loss will affect rivers. Physical, chemical, and biological processes change from headwaters to large rivers; thus, we expect ice processes and resulting effects on the ecology of rivers could also vary with river size, as a result of the associated changes in geomorphology, temperature regimes, and connectivity. To conceptualize these relationships, we review typically disparate literature on ice processes and winter ecology and compare what is known in the smallest and largest rivers. In doing so, we show that our ability to link ice with ecology across river networks is made difficult by a primary focus on ice processes in larger rivers and a lack of study of ecosystem processes during winter. To address some of these gaps, we provide new scenarios of river ice loss and analyses of how the annual importance of winter gross primary productivity (GPP) varies with river size. We show projected ice loss varied with large-scale watershed characteristics such as north-south orientation and that the importance of winter to annual GPP was greatest in the smallest rivers. Finally, we highlight information needed to fill knowledge gaps on winter across river networks and improve our understanding of how rivers may change as climate and ice regimes shift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available