4.6 Article

Influence of a DLC coating topography in the piston ring/cylinder liner tribological performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 483-493

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.044

Keywords

Piston ring; Surface topography; Tribological performance

Funding

  1. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) [SFRH/BDE/110654/2015, UID/EEA/04436/2019]
  2. MAHLE, Componentes de Motores, S.A. [SFRH/BDE/110654/2015]
  3. FEDER (PT2020) [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006941, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000018-HAMaBICo, ATRITO-0, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030446]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BDE/110654/2015] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated how different surface finishing processes affect the tribological performance of coated compression piston rings, finding that surface finishing processes contribute to a decrease in the coefficient of friction and have an impact on the wear of the piston ring and the counterbody.
In the piston ring-cylinder system, the surface topography is crucial to their tribological performance, emphasizing the relevance of the surface finishing processes. The present work studied the influence of different finishing processes in the surface roughness parameters of the coated compression piston rings. Three distinct surfaces' finishing processes were used in the first approach: Option A, B, and C. Options D comprised the variation of different processing parameters. The piston rings with different surface topographies were tribologically evaluated using a tribometer developed explicitly for this industrial evaluation. Regarding the tribological performance, it was concluded that the use of the surface finishing processes fostered a decrease in the coefficient of friction. The surface finishing had also impacted the wear of the piston ring and in the counterbody. An increase in the piston rings' surface roughness led to a rise in the surface's weight loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available