4.8 Article

A Retrospective Observational Study of Adverse Reactions Associated With Intravenous Immunoglobulin Infusion

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.740517

Keywords

immunoglobulin; adverse reactions; risk factors; autoimmune diseases; neuromuscular diseases

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that risk factors for adverse reactions associated with IVIG therapy include female sex, adult age, high dose IVIG, autoimmune disease, and neuromuscular disease. Multivariate logistic regression identified neuromuscular disease as a significant factor for adverse reactions to IVIG.
Background Although intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy is generally safe and well tolerated, adverse reactions (ARs) do occur. The majority of these ARs are mild and transient. Risk factors for ARs associate with IVIG infusions are not well established. This study investigated possible risk factors influencing the occurrence of IVIG-associated ARs. Study Design and Methods This was a retrospective observational analysis of data accumulated over 5 years, including patient demographics, clinical condition, IVIG dosing regimens, number of IVIG infusions, and any ARs. Results ARs were associated with IVIG in 4.9% of patients and 2.5% of infusions. By univariate analyses, ARs correlated with female sex, adult age, high dose IVIG, and autoimmune disease. Multivariate logistic regression identified three statistically significant of risk factors: on a per-patient basis, being female (p=0.0018), having neuromuscular disease (p=0.0002), and receiving higher doses of IVIG per patient body weight (p<0.001), on a per-infusion basis, being female (p < 0.001), being adolescents to middle age (p < 0.001), and having neuromuscular disease (p < 0.001). Conclusion Neuromuscular disease emerged as one of the significant factors for ARs to IVIG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available