4.6 Article

The Interaction of Graphene Oxide with the Pollen-Stigma System: In Vivo Effects on the Sexual Reproduction of Cucurbita pepo L.

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11136150

Keywords

fruit development; flowers; nanomaterials; particulate matter; pollen germination; seed development; stigmatic surface

Funding

  1. University of Trieste DOTTAMBIENTEVITA34-18 [785219, 881603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that graphene oxide had a negative impact on pollen adhesion and germination on the stigma of summer squash, resulting in defective fruit development and inhibited seed development.
Applications involving graphene-related materials (GRMs) are becoming very common, raising concerns for their environmental impact. GRMs induce various effects on plants, but those on the sexual reproduction are still largely unknown. Here, the effects of graphene oxide (GO) and GO purified from production residues (PGO) were tested in vivo on the stigma of Cucurbita pepo L. ssp. pepo Greyzini (summer squash). Stigmas were exposed to GO or PGO for three hours and were then analyzed by environmental scanning electron microscopy to verify possible alterations to their surface. Stigmas were then hand-pollinated to verify the effects of the two GOs on pollen adhesion and germination on the stigma, and, subsequently, on the development of fruits and seeds. Severe damages to the stigma were not detected; nevertheless, both pollen adhesion and germination on the stigma decreased. Moreover, fruits developed defectively with signs of necrosis in the case of GO, whereas fruits did not ripen in the case of PGO and ovules did not develop seeds after both GOs treatments. These results highlight different mechanisms of interaction of the two materials with the pollen-stigma system, suggesting a possible negative impact of GO on the sexual reproduction of other seed plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available