4.6 Review

Management and controversies of classical Hodgkin lymphoma in pregnancy

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 169, Issue 5, Pages 613-630

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13327

Keywords

Hodgkin lymphoma; doxorubicin; bleomycin; vinblastine and dacarbazine; vinblastine; pregnancy; teratogenicity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2011-13-008] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of managing classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) in pregnancy is to obtain good long-term outcomes for both the mother and fetus. Given the excellent outcomes outside of pregnancy, the goal of treatment should remain curative. There remains a tension and debate regarding the timing of chemotherapy, the curative nature of such treatment and the timing of delivery. Moreover, the aim during pregnancy should be to minimize fetal toxicity and optimize perinatal outcomes. The management of cHL within pregnancy was covered within the excellent recent British Committee for Standards in Haematology guidelines, but with necessary brevity. By reviewing the literature over the last 30years, herein we discuss the options for management during each trimester. Critical organogenesis occurs between 2 and 8weeks post-conception; during which time the immature fetus is vulnerable to cytotoxic exposure. We discuss the evidence for using ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) and single agent vinblastine in the first trimester. cHL presenting in pregnancy raises complex and difficult ethical dilemmas that can cause anxiety for patients, families and physicians. Decision-making must be multi-disciplinary and holistic, taking into account the patient's wishes, psycho-social and religious beliefs and personal circumstances. Clear communication between the haemato-oncologist, medical obstetrician, nurse specialists, midwives and neonatologists is paramount to a successful outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available