4.6 Article

What do alexithymia items measure? A discriminant content validity study of the Toronto-alexithymia-scale-20

Journal

PEERJ
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11639

Keywords

Alexithymia; TAS-20; Content validation; Discriminant content validity method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the Toronto Alexithymia Scale only partly measures alexithymia, with some subscales representing the construct but showing content overlap, and some items also assessing anxiety. It is recommended to revise the scale to adequately assess all key features of alexithymia.
Background: Questions have been raised about whether items of alexithymia scales assess the construct alexithymia and its key features, and no other related constructs. This study assessed the (discriminant) content validity of the most widely used alexithymia scale, i.e., the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Methods: Participants (n = 81) rated to what extent TAS-20 items and items of related constructs were relevant for assessing the constructs 'alexithymia', 'difficulty identifying feelings', 'difficulty describing feelings', 'externally-oriented thinking', 'limited imaginal capacity', 'anxiety', 'depression', and 'health anxiety'. Results: Results revealed that, overall, the TAS-20 did only partly measure 'alexithymia'. Only the subscales 'difficulty identifying feelings' and 'difficulty describing feelings' represented 'alexithymia' and their intended construct, although some content overlap between these subscales was found. In addition, some items assessed (health) anxiety equally well or even better. Conclusions: Revision of the TAS-20 is recommended to adequately assess all key features of alexithymia. Findings with the TAS-20 need to be interpreted with caution in people suffering from medical conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available