4.5 Article

Slab mantle dehydrates beneath KamchatkaYet recycles water into the deep mantle

Journal

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages 2987-3007

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016GC006335

Keywords

rainfall-runoff; scaling; heterogeneity in soil hydraulic properties; surface sealing; run-on; patched vegetation cover

Funding

  1. DFG [KO 3450/2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The subduction of hydrated slab mantle is the most important and yet weakly constrained factor in the quantification of the Earth's deep geologic water cycle. The most critical unknowns are the initial hydration state and the dehydration behavior of the subducted oceanic mantle. Here we present a combined thermomechanical, thermodynamic, and geochemical model of the Kamchatka subduction zone that indicates significant dehydration of subducted slab mantle beneath Kamchatka. Evidence for the subduction of hydrated oceanic mantle comes from across-arc trends of boron concentrations and isotopic compositions in arc volcanic rocks. Our thermodynamic-geochemical models successfully predict the complex geochemical patterns and the spatial distribution of arc volcanoes in Kamchatka assuming the subduction of hydrated oceanic mantle. Our results show that water content and dehydration behavior of the slab mantle beneath Kamchatka can be directly linked to compositional features in arc volcanic rocks. Depending on hydration depth of the slab mantle, our models yield water recycling rates between 1.1 x 10(3) and 7.4 x 10(3) Tg/Ma/km corresponding to values between 0.75 x 10(6) and 5.2 x 10(6) Tg/Ma for the entire Kamchatkan subduction zone. These values are up to one order of magnitude lower than previous estimates for Kamchatka, but clearly show that subducted hydrated slab mantle significantly contributes to the water budget in the Kamchatkan subduction zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available