4.6 Article

Metadata Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Impacts of Wheat Residues Burning on Soil Quality in Developing and Developed Countries

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13116356

Keywords

agroecosystem sustainability; climate change; crop residue burning; food security; soil quality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the potential environmental impacts of wheat residues burning on soil quality in Iran and Italy over the last 50 years. The results showed an increase in global warming potential in Iran and a decrease in Italy, with nitrogen being the main component of nutrient losses in both countries.
Crop residues are widely considered as a biofuel source and used in livestock feeding, or are burned off to clean the field for tillage and planting. Nonetheless, crop residue burning poses serious threats to the soil stability and sustainability of the food chain. This study aimed to investigate the potential environmental impacts of wheat residues burning on declines in soil quality in developing (Iran) and developed (Italy) countries by analyzing metadata of the last 50 years. All metadata were provided from the 'Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations' (FAO) including wheat harvested area, annual production, and biomass burning, to assess the potential impact of crop residue burning on soil quality. In detail, the greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission, and energy and nutrient losses by the wheat residues burning were estimated. Our results showed a robust interdependence between wheat residues burning and environmental effects in both developed and developing systems. Accordingly, the global warming potential increased in Iran (4286 to 5604 kg CO(2)eq) and decreased in Italy (3528 to 1524 kg CO(2)eq) over the last 50 years. Amongst all nutrient losses, nitrogen represents the higher lost value in both countries, followed by potassium, sulfur, and phosphorus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available