4.4 Article

Characterization and abiotic stress-responsive expression analysis of SGT1 genes in Brassica oleracea

Journal

GENOME
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 243-251

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/gen-2015-0128

Keywords

abiotic stress resistance; BolSGT1; Brassica oleracea var. capitata; gene expression

Funding

  1. Golden Seed Project (Center for Horticultural Seed Development) [213003-04-3-SB110, 213003-04-3-SBV10]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA)
  3. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF)
  4. Rural Development Administration (RDA)
  5. Korea Forest Service (KFS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SGT1 genes are involved in enhancing plant responses to various biotic and abiotic stresses. Brassica oleracea is known to contain two types of SGT1 genes, namely suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 and suppressor of GCR2. In this study, through systematic analysis, four putative SGT1 genes were identified and characterized in B. oleracea. In phylogenetic analysis, the genes clearly formed separate groups, namely BolSGT1a, BolSGT1b (both suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 types), and BolSGT1 (suppressor of GCR2). Functional domain analysis and organ-specific expression patterns suggested possible roles for BolSGT1 genes during stress conditions. BolSGT1 genes showed significant changes in expression in response to heat, cold, drought, salt, or ABA treatment. Interaction network analysis supported the expression analysis, and showed that the BolSGT1a and BolSGT1b genes are strongly associated with co-regulators during stress conditions. However, the BolSGT1 gene did not show any strong association. Hence, BolSGT1 might be a stress resistance-related gene that functions without a co-regulator. Our results show that BolSGT1 genes are potential target genes to improve B. oleracea resistance to abiotic stresses such as heat, cold, and salt.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available