4.7 Article

Combining Metagenomic Sequencing With Whole Exome Sequencing to Optimize Clinical Strategies in Neonates With a Suspected Central Nervous System Infection

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.671109

Keywords

metagenomic sequencing; WES; suspected central nervous system infection; neonates; NICU

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [19495810300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) significantly improves the diagnostic rate of etiology for neonatal central nervous system infections, guiding clinical strategies effectively.
Objectives Central nervous system (CNS) infection has a high incidence and mortality in neonates, but conventional tests are time-consuming and have a low sensitivity. Some rare genetic diseases may have some similar clinical manifestations as CNS infection. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing neonatal CNS infection and to explore the etiology of neonatal suspected CNS infection by combining mNGS with whole exome sequencing (WES). Methods We prospectively enrolled neonates with a suspected CNS infection who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit(NICU) from September 1, 2019, to May 31, 2020. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples collected from all patients were tested by using conventional methods and mNGS. For patients with a confirmed CNS infection and patients with an unclear clinical diagnosis, WES was performed on blood samples. Results Eighty-eight neonatal patients were enrolled, and 101 CSF samples were collected. Fourty-three blood samples were collected for WES. mNGS showed a sample diagnostic yield of 19.8% (20/101) compared to 4.95% (5/101) for the conventional methods. In the empirical treatment group, the detection rate of mNGS was significantly higher than that of conventional methods [27% vs. 6.3%, p=0.002]. Among the 88 patients, 15 patients were etiologically diagnosed by mNGS alone, five patients were etiologically identified by WES alone, and one patient was diagnosed by both mNGS and WES. Twelve of 13 diagnoses based solely on mNGS had a likely clinical effect. Six patients diagnosed by WES also experienced clinical effect. Conclusions For patients with a suspected CNS infections, mNGS combined with WES might significantly improve the diagnostic rate of the etiology and effectively guide clinical strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available