Trajectories of pain and function in the first five years after total hip and knee arthroplasty
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Trajectories of pain and function in the first five years after total hip and knee arthroplasty
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Bone & Joint Journal
Volume 103-B, Issue 6, Pages 1111-1118
Publisher
British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
Online
2021-06-01
DOI
10.1302/0301-620x.103b6.bjj-2020-1437.r1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Review of response rates over time in registry-based studies using patient-reported outcome measures
- (2020) Katherine Wang et al. BMJ Open
- How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up
- (2019) Jonathan T Evans et al. LANCET
- Have the frequency of and reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty changed since 2000? Comparison of two cohorts from the same hospital: 255 cases (2013–2016) and 68 cases (1991–1998)
- (2019) Julien Pietrzak et al. Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research
- Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Total Joint Arthroplasty in a Developing Country
- (2017) Jennifer Bido et al. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
- Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries
- (2016) Ola Rolfson et al. Acta Orthopaedica
- Preoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review
- (2016) Stefanie N. Hofstede et al. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
- A non-response analysis of 2-year data in the Swedish Knee Ligament Register
- (2016) John Reinholdsson et al. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
- kmlandkml3d:RPackages to Cluster Longitudinal Data
- (2015) Christophe Genolini et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- The reasons for knee arthroplasty revisions are incomparable in the different arthroplasty registries
- (2015) Tuukka T. Niinimäki KNEE
- Loss to follow-up after total hip replacement: a source of bias in patient reported outcome measures and registry datasets?
- (2014) Mohamed A. Imam et al. Hip International
- Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Hip Score in a meaningful way?
- (2014) K. K. Harris et al. Bone & Joint Research
- Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Knee Score in a meaningful way? An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
- (2013) Kristina Harris et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Joint Registries
- (2013) S. Konan et al. Bone & Joint Journal
- The failure of survivorship
- (2011) V. Wylde et al. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME
- Assessing patients for joint replacement
- (2011) A. Judge et al. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME
- Patient Compliance with Clinical Follow-up After Total Joint Arthroplasty
- (2008) John C Clohisy et al. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
- (2008) Erik von Elm et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started