4.6 Article

Linking Hydrogeology and Ecology in Karst Landscapes: The Response of Epigean and Obligate Groundwater Copepods (Crustacea: Copepoda)

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13152106

Keywords

karst; groundwater; cave; sinking stream; biodiversity

Funding

  1. European Community [LIFE12 BIO/IT/000231 AQUALIFE]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the composition of invertebrate assemblages in an Apennine karst system in Italy, mainly focused on the response of different species to the hydrogeological traits of the karst unit. The results showed that epigean species were primarily sourced from the rapidly infiltrating surface waters, while obligate groundwater dwellers mainly originated from the perched aquifer in the epikarst layer.
Groundwater invertebrate communities in karst landscapes are known to vary in response to multiple environmental factors. This study aims to explore the invertebrate assemblages' composition of an Apennine karst system in Italy mainly described by the Rio Gamberale surface stream and the Stiffe Cave. The stream sinks into the carbonate rock and predominantly feeds the saturated karst into the cave. For a minor portion, groundwater flows from the epikarst and the perched aquifer within it. The spatial distribution of the species belonging to the selected target group of the Crustacea Copepoda between the surface stream and the groundwater habitats inside the cave highlighted a different response of surface-water species and obligate groundwater dwellers to the hydrogeological traits of the karst unit. Our results suggest that fast endorheic infiltration routes promoted the drift of epigean species from the surface to groundwater via the sinking stream while most of the obligate groundwater dwellers come from the perched aquifer in the epikarst from diffuse infiltration pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available