4.7 Article

Thermal and Dielectric Properties of Cyanate Ester Cured Main Chain Rigid-Rod Epoxy Resin

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13172917

Keywords

epoxy resin; liquid crystal; cyanate esters; thermal properties; dielectric properties

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 108-2218-E-239-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the thermal and dielectric properties of rigid-rod bifunctional epoxy resin and commercial epoxy resin, finding that the rigid-rod structure exhibited better performance with higher 5% weight loss temperature and smaller thermal expansion coefficient than the flexible structure. Additionally, the rigid-rod system demonstrated higher Tg and better dielectric properties when enough curing agent was provided.
Thermal and dielectric properties of rigid-rod bifunctional epoxy resin 4,4-bis(2,3-epoxypropoxy) biphenyl epoxy (BP) and commercial epoxy resin diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) were studied using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA), thermal mechanical analyzer (TMA) and dielectric analyzer (DEA). These two epoxies were cured with cyanate ester hardener 2,2'-bis(4-cyanatophenyl) propane (AroCy B10). The BP/B10 system consisting of a rigid-rod structure exhibited better thermal properties than the DGEBA/B10 system with a flexible structure. Anisotropic BP/B10 (2:1) had the highest 5% weight loss temperature, the highest amount of residue and a smaller thermal expansion coefficient than the commercial DGEBA/B10 system. The BP/B10 system, which cured at the LC phase temperature, had higher Tg than the commercial DGEBA/B10 system, as found from dynamic mechanical analysis. The BP/B10 system also demonstrated better dielectric properties than the commercial DGEBA/B10 system when enough curing agent was provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available