4.4 Review

Roles of nuclear receptors in hepatic stellate cells

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 879-890

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1949288

Keywords

Hepatic stellate cells; nuclear receptor; liver fibrosis; ppar; fxr

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82003828]
  2. Xinglin Foundation of Chengdu University of TCM [YYZX2020019, YYZX2020012]
  3. medical scientific research project of Chengdu health committee [2019069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review highlights the regulatory role of nuclear receptors (NRs) in Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and their potential as drug targets in liver fibrosis. NRs are still considered promising therapy targets for inhibiting HSC activation and liver fibrosis, but the development of NRs agonists or antagonists to inhibit HSCs requires careful consideration of systemic effects.
Introduction: Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are essential for physiological homeostasis of the liver extracellular matrix (ECM). Excessive transdifferentiation of HSC from a quiescent to an activated phenotype contributes to disrupt this balance and can lead to liver fibrosis. Accumulating evidence has suggested that nuclear receptors (NRs) are involved in the regulation of HSC activation, proliferation, and function. Therefore, these NRs may be therapeutic targets to balance ECM homeostasis and inhibit HSC activation in liver fibrosis. Areas covered: In this review, the authors summarized the recent progress in the understanding of the regulatory role of NRs in HSCs and their potential as drug targets in liver fibrosis. Expert opinion: NRs are still potential therapy targets for inhibiting HSCs activation and liver fibrosis. However, the development of NRs agonists or antagonists to inhibit HSCs requires fully consideration of systemic effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available