4.8 Article

Breast tumor stiffness instructs bone metastasis via maintenance of mechanical conditioning

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 35, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109293

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI [R01 CA196885-01]
  2. NHLBI [R00 HL123485, R01 HL147187]
  3. NIAID [R01 AI116629-01A1]
  4. Timothy and Diane Bowden Fellowship
  5. NIH/T32 [HL007249-42]
  6. American Heart Association predoctoral fellowship [20PRE35200195]
  7. NCI University of Arizona Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA023074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer cells show distinct metastatic phenotypes in response to fibrotic-like matrix stiffness, which are maintained by RUNX2 transcription factor. The mechanical conditioning score (MeCo) is associated with bone metastasis in breast cancer patients, suggesting its potential as a predictive marker.
While the immediate and transitory response of breast cancer cells to pathological stiffness in their native microenvironment has been well explored, it remains unclear how stiffness-induced phenotypes are maintained over time after cancer cell dissemination in vivo. Here, we show that fibrotic-like matrix stiffness promotes distinct metastatic phenotypes in cancer cells, which are preserved after transition to softer microenvironments, such as bone marrow. Using differential gene expression analysis of stiffness-responsive breast cancer cells, we establish a multigenic score of mechanical conditioning (MeCo) and find that it is associated with bone metastasis in patients with breast cancer. The maintenance of mechanical conditioning is regulated by RUNX2, an osteogenic transcription factor, established driver of bone metastasis, and mitotic book-marker that preserves chromatin accessibility at target gene loci. Using genetic and functional approaches, we demonstrate that mechanical conditioning maintenance can be simulated, repressed, or extended, with corresponding changes in bone metastatic potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available