4.7 Article

Comparing the regulation and incentivization of e-cigarettes across 97 countries

Journal

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Volume 291, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114187

Keywords

E-cigarettes; Vaping; Regulation; Taxation; Health protection; Harm reduction

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Ontario Government's Ministry of Research, Innovation Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite uncertainty surrounding the long-term health impacts and effectiveness for tobacco smoking cessation of e-cigarettes, their global use continues to rise. Various governments face unique challenges in regulating and incentivizing these products in a way that optimizes public health, with options ranging from prohibition to promoting harm reduction. Through comparative public policy analysis, this study aims to inform future decisions by governments on addressing the public health challenges posed by e-cigarettes.
E-cigarette use continues to increase globally despite uncertainty regarding their long-term health impacts and around their effectiveness for tobacco smoking cessation. This uncertainty creates unique challenges for governments as they attempt to optimally regulate and positively or negatively incentivize these products in a way that maximizes the public's health. Current approaches to e-cigarette regulation and incentivization fall within a spectrum of options ranging from a singular focus on health protection, whereby policies intend to prevent the dangers of e-cigarettes, to a singular focus on using e-cigarettes for harm reduction, whereby policies intend to reduce the more harmful effects of smoking tobacco. Regulation options include prohibition, component ban, and regulation as medicinal products, poisons, tobacco products, consumer products, and/or unique products. Incentivization options include taxation, subsidization, and providing a financial reward. Through comparative public policy analysis, this study describes, compares and assesses the variety of approaches that 97 countries have taken to regulate and incentivize e-cigarettes. The goal is to inform future decisions by governments on how they approach the public health challenge posed by e-cigarettes, building on a nuanced understanding of the complexities of this challenge and what other jurisdictions have already implemented and learned.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available