4.2 Article

Treatment of chronic axial back pain with 60-day percutaneous medial branch PNS: Primary end point results from a prospective, multicenter study

Journal

PAIN PRACTICE
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 877-889

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/papr.13055

Keywords

axial low back pain; chronic back pain; medial branch stimulation; multifidus activation; neuromodulation; non-opioid; percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS); peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)

Funding

  1. SPR Therapeutics, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of participants in this study reported clinically and statistically significant reductions in pain intensity, disability, and pain interference. Long-term follow-up showed that these reductions were sustained in a majority of participants through 14 months after the start of treatment.
Background The objective of this prospective, multicenter study is to characterize responses to percutaneous medial branch peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to determine if results from earlier, smaller single-center studies and reports were generalizable when performed at a larger number and wider variety of centers in patients recalcitrant to nonsurgical treatments. Materials & Methods Participants with chronic axial low back pain (LBP) were implanted with percutaneous PNS leads targeting the lumbar medial branch nerves for up to 60 days, after which the leads were removed. Participants were followed long-term for 12 months after the 2-month PNS treatment. Data collection is complete for visits through end of treatment with PNS (primary end point) and 6 months after lead removal (8 months after start of treatment), with some participant follow-up visits thereafter in progress. Results Clinically and statistically significant reductions in pain intensity, disability, and pain interference were reported by a majority of participants. Seventy-three percent of participants were successes for the primary end point, reporting clinically significant (>= 30%) reductions in back pain intensity after the 2-month percutaneous PNS treatment (n = 54/74). Whereas prospective follow-up is ongoing, among those who had already completed the long-term follow-up visits (n = 51), reductions in pain intensity, disability, and pain interference were sustained in a majority of participants through 14 months after the start of treatment. Conclusion Given the minimally invasive, nondestructive nature of percutaneous PNS and the significant benefits experienced by participants who were recalcitrant to nonsurgical treatments, percutaneous PNS may provide a promising first-line neurostimulation treatment option for patients with chronic axial back pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Review Medicine, Research & Experimental

Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Groin Pain: A Review

Steven Char, Ross A. Barman, Timothy R. Deer, Jonathan M. Hagedorn

Summary: Chronic neuropathic groin pain is a challenging condition with multiple identified etiologies. Advances in neuromodulation technology, particularly DRG stimulation, have provided benefits for patients with refractory chronic pain. Prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the effectiveness of DRG stimulation for chronic groin pain.

NEUROMODULATION (2022)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Long-Term Outcomes of Restorative Neurostimulation in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Secondary to Multifidus Dysfunction: Two-Year Results of the ReActiv8-B Pivotal Trial

Christopher Gilligan, Willem Volschenk, Marc Russo, Matthew Green, Christopher Gilmore, Vivek Mehta, Kristiaan Deckers, Kris De Smedt, Usman Latif, Peter Georgius, Jonathan Gentile, Bruce Mitchell, Meredith Langhorst, Frank Huygen, Ganesan Baranidharan, Vikas Patel, Eugene Mironer, Edgar Ross, Alexios Carayannopoulos, Salim Hayek, Ashish Gulve, Jean-Pierre Van Buyten, Antoine Tohmeh, Jeffrey Fischgrund, Shivanand Lad, Farshad Ahadian, Timothy Deer, William Klemme, Richard Rauck, James Rathmell, Greg Maislin, Jan Pieter Heemels, Sam Eldabe

Summary: This study followed up with 204 patients implanted with a restorative neurostimulation system and found that after two years, 76% of patients experienced substantial, clinically meaningful improvements in pain, disability, or both.

NEUROMODULATION (2023)

Review Anesthesiology

Cluneal neuropathy: Background, diagnosis, and treatment

Mehul J. Desai, Sargoon Nepaul

Summary: This article provides a narrative review of three clinical entities of cluneal neuropathy, including superior, middle, and inferior cluneal neuralgia. It also discusses the challenges in diagnosis and treatment, and the treatment methods such as nerve blocks, ablative techniques, neuromodulation, and surgical decompression.

PAIN PRACTICE (2023)

Editorial Material Clinical Neurology

Serious Issues in Authorship, Design, and Conclusions of JAMA Neurology Real-World Evidence Study on Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes and Costs as Compared to Conventional Medical Therapy

Timothy Deer, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Krishnan Chakravarthy, Joshua M. Rosenow, Steven Falowski, Erika Petersen, Julie Pilitsis, Corey Hunter, Dawood Sayed, Michael E. Schatman

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH (2023)

Editorial Material Anesthesiology

Hypocrisy in conflict-of-interest disclosure in medical society leadership

Timothy R. Deer, Peter S. Staats, Sudhir Diwan, Amol Soin, Konstantin V. Slavin, Douglas P. Beall, Christopher J. Gilligan

PAIN PRACTICE (2023)

Article Clinical Neurology

Birds of a Feather Redux: Defining Ways to Stimulate the Peripheral Nervous System

Timothy Deer, Anuj Shah, Konstantin Slavin, Kevin E. Vorenkamp, Shalini Shah, Michael Leong, W. Porter McRoberts

Summary: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has gained interest due to advancements in imaging techniques and the availability of minimally invasive stimulation systems. However, PNS requires unique technical requirements and skills compared to other pain management procedures. This article aims to educate about the differences and help patients and healthcare providers make informed decisions.

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH (2023)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Treatment of Refractory Low Back Pain Using Passive Recharge Burst in Patients Without Options for Corrective Surgery: Findings and Results From the DISTINCT Study, a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial

Timothy Deer, Christopher Gilligan, Steven Falowski, Mehul Desai, Julie Pilitsis, Jessica Jameson, Susan Moeschler, Robert Heros, Edward Tavel, Anne Christopher, Denis Patterson, Sayed Wahezi, Jacqueline Weisbein, Ajay Antony, Robert Funk, Mohab Ibrahim, Chi Lim, Derron Wilson, Michael Fishell, Keith Scarfo, David Dickerson, Edward Braun, Patrick Buchanan, Robert M. Levy, Nathan Miller, Jonathan Duncan, Jijun Xu, Kenneth Candido, Scott Kreiner, Marie E. Fahey, James Yue

Summary: The study demonstrates that spinal cord stimulation is effective in relieving chronic low back pain and improving pain-related disability and quality of life in patients. It also suggests that it may lead to reduced opioid use and other treatments.

NEUROMODULATION (2023)

Article Anesthesiology

ECAP-controlled closed-loop versus open-loop SCS for the treatment of chronic pain: 36-month results of the EVOKE blinded randomized clinical trial

Nagy A. Mekhail, Robert M. Levy, Timothy R. Deer, Leonardo Kapural, Sean Li, Kasra Amirdelfan, Jason E. Pope, Corey W. Hunter, Steven M. Rosen, Shrif J. Costandi, Steven M. Falowski, Abram H. Burgher, Christopher A. Gilmore, Farooq A. Qureshi, Peter S. Staats, James Scowcroft, Tory Mcjunkin, Jonathan Carlson, Christopher K. Kim, Michael Yang, Thomas Stauss, Erika A. Petersen, Jonathan M. Hagedorn, Richard Rauck, Jan W. Kallewaard, Ganesan Baranidharan, Rod S. Taylor, Lawrence Poree, Dan Brounstein, Rui Duarte, Gerrit E. Gmel, Robert Gorman, Ian Gould, Erin Hanson, Dean M. Karantonis, Abeer Khurram, Angela Leitner, Dave Mugan, Milan Obradovic, Zhonghua Ouyang, John Parker, Peter Single, Nicole Soliday, E. V. O. K. E. Study Grp EVOKE Study Grp

Summary: This study compared the effects of evoked compound action potential (ECAP)-controlled, closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with fixed-output, open-loop SCS after 36 months of implantation. The results showed that ECAP-controlled closed-loop SCS was more effective than open-loop SCS in reducing back and leg pain, and it also improved holistic treatment response.

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE (2023)

Article Anesthesiology

The MOTION study: Two-year results of a real-world randomized controlled trial of the mild((R)) procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

Timothy R. Deer, Timothy B. Chafin, Shrif J. Costandi, Huaguang Qu, Christopher Kim, Navdeep Jassal, Kiran Patel, Aaron Calodney

Summary: The MOTION study aims to evaluate the impact of percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression as a first-line treatment for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. The study compared the combination of the mild procedure and conventional medical management to conventional medical management alone, using objective and patient-reported outcome measures. The results showed significant improvements in all outcome measures for the mild + CMM group compared to the CMM-Alone group, and demonstrated the durability and safety of the mild procedure.

PAIN PRACTICE (2023)

Article Clinical Neurology

Early Clinical Results of Intervertebral Joint Stabilization by Injectable Load-Sharing Polymers

Thomas Hedman, James Yu, Harwant Singh, Timothy Deer

Summary: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a genipin-based implant for treating discogenic chronic low back pain (CLBP) through IRB-approved prospective studies in two countries. The results showed that the device could effectively improve pain and disability, enhance joint stability, and had no serious adverse events. This study merits further randomized clinical trials.

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH (2023)

Correction Clinical Neurology

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice(vol 15, pg 1305, 2022)

A. Abd-Sayed, K. Fiala, J. Weisbein

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH (2023)

Article Clinical Neurology

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Guidelines for Radiofrequency Ablative Procedures in Patients with Implanted Devices

Timothy Sowder, Dawood Sayed, Tyler Concannon, Scott H. Pew, Natalie H. Strand, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Christopher S. Wie, Daniel E. Gomez Ramos, Ahmed M. Raslan, Timothy R. Deer

Summary: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a treatment method used for various conditions, but it may have an impact on patients with implanted medical devices. This review focuses on establishing guidelines to assist physicians in safely managing implanted devices during RFA procedures.

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH (2023)

Article Clinical Neurology

Best Practices from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) for Clinical Research During a Pandemic or Emergency

Erika A. Petersen, Timothy R. Deer, Stana Bojanic, Lauren R. Sankary, Natalie H. Strand, Adnan Al Kaisy, Frank Huygen, Dawood Sayed, Monique Steegers, Paul Verrills, Michael E. Schatman

Summary: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the lack of preparedness in conducting research and completing ongoing projects in the field of pain medicine during a global crisis. The ASPN Research Group has provided guidance for conducting clinical trials in emergency or disaster situations, utilizing governmental guidance, scientific best practices, and expert opinion. This analysis fills a gap in the current literature and offers protocols to improve patient safety and efficacy in future disasters and infectious disease outbreaks.

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH (2023)

Review Anesthesiology

Pocket pain following spinal cord stimulator generator implantation: A narrative review of this under-reported risk

Lindsay Burke, Mehul J. Desai

Summary: This narrative review aims to analyze the incidence and risk factors of pocket pain in SCS patients, in order to guide treatment options and reduce its occurrence. Currently, there is a lack of primary literature on this topic, highlighting the need for large-scale, high-quality prospective or randomized controlled trials.

PAIN PRACTICE (2023)

Article Anesthesiology

Bipolar radiofrequency ablation lesion areas and confluence: An ex vivo study and technical report

Andrew Wondra, Shelly Gulhar, Mason D. Brestle, Jiling Chou, Mehul J. Desai

Summary: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is commonly used for treating chronic pain by damaging neural tissues. This study evaluated RFA lesion areas and lesion continuity using different gauge probes, providing recommendations for clinical practice.

PAIN PRACTICE (2023)

No Data Available