4.6 Article

Modeling of Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Rubberized Concrete Using Machine Learning

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14154346

Keywords

self-compacting rubberized concrete; compressive strength; machine learning; artificial neural networks; regression tree ensembles; support vector regression; Gaussian process regression

Funding

  1. Croatian Ministry of Science and Education
  2. Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art machine learning methods for estimating self-compacting rubberized concrete compressive strength. The study found that ensembles of MLP-ANNs performed best in forecasting, while the simpler GPR model also showed high accuracy with the potential for feature reduction using ARD.
This paper gives a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art machine learning methods that can be used for estimating self-compacting rubberized concrete (SCRC) compressive strength, including multilayered perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN), ensembles of MLP-ANNs, regression tree ensembles (random forests, boosted and bagged regression trees), support vector regression (SVR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR). As a basis for the development of the forecast model, a database was obtained from an experimental study containing a total of 166 samples of SCRC. Ensembles of MLP-ANNs showed the best performance in forecasting with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.81 MPa and Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (R) of 0.96. The significantly simpler GPR model had almost the same accuracy criterion values as the most accurate model; furthermore, feature reduction is easy to combine with GPR using automatic relevance determination (ARD), leading to models with better performance and lower complexity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available