4.0 Review

Therapeutic effect of Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway-related drugs on age-related eye diseases through anti-oxidative stress

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 1260-1273

Publisher

IJO PRESS
DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.08.19

Keywords

oxidative stress; Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway; age-related eye diseases

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81970801, 81670859]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2019JJ40001]
  3. Key Project of Changsha Science and Technology Bureau [kh1801229]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Age-related eye diseases are leading causes of vision loss worldwide, and oxidative stress in the eye plays a crucial role in their development. The Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway is involved in resisting oxidative stress and inflammation, and drugs targeting this pathway have shown therapeutic effects on age-related eye diseases.
Age-related eye diseases, including cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy (DR), and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), are the leading causes of vision loss in the world. Several studies have shown that the occurrence and development of these diseases have an important relationship with oxidative stress in the eye. The Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway is a classical pathway that resists oxidative stress and inflammation in the body. This pathway is also active in the development of age-related eye diseases. A variety of drugs have been shown to treat age-related eye diseases through the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE (Kelch-like ECH-Associating protein 1- nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor 2-antioxidant response element) pathway. This review describes the role of oxidative stress in the development of age-related eye diseases, the function and regulation of the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway, and the therapeutic effects of drugs associated with this pathway on age-related eye diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available