4.8 Article

Achieving Efficient Magnesium-Sulfur Battery Chemistry via Polysulfide Mediation

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 31, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202101552

Keywords

operando UV-vis spectroscopy; polysulfides; sulfur batteries

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China under Joint Research Scheme NSFC/RGC [N_CUHK435/18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnesium-sulfur batteries offer higher theoretical volumetric energy density and lower cost compared to lithium-sulfur batteries, but suffer from poor cycle life and low energy efficiency. By increasing polysulfide solubility with high-donor-number solvents like dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), the discharge capacity and sulfur overpotential can be improved, leading to higher performance and reversible cycling.
Magnesium-sulfur batteries promise a higher theoretical volumetric energy density, improved safety, and lower cost compared to lithium-sulfur batteries. However, Mg-S batteries suffer from poor cycle life and low energy efficiency. Here, it is revealed that Mg-S reactions are dominated by solid-solid reactions due to much lower polysulfide solubility in the presence of Mg2+ compared to that of Li+ in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME)-based electrolyte, leading to sluggish kinetics and poor reversibility. The polysulfide solubility is increased by using high-donor-number solvents (e.g., dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)), which increases the discharge capacity from 660 to approximate to 1500 mAh g(-1) and decreases the sulfur overpotential from >600 to approximate to 200 mV at 0.1 C (energy efficiency over 90%). Based on this strategy, an Mg-S cathode with DMSO-based electrolyte demonstrates a reversible capacity of 700 mAh g(-1) at 0.4 C over 300 cycles. This work reveals a reaction limitation of Mg-S batteries and provides critical insights into the electrolyte design for high-energy and reversible Mg-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available